敲打是什么意思
Content deleted Content added
→V1.0 Prototype feedback: Pelagic: Added reply |
→V1.0 Prototype feedback: Pelagic: Added reply |
||
Line 191:
::I agree that the inconsistent behavior in wikitext is annoying, but ''something'' has to be inconsistent, as long as we can't embed normal wikitext markup inside a list item.
::At least the visual mode behaves the same for replies and new discussions… [[User:Matma Rex|Matma Rex]] ([[User talk:Matma Rex|talk]]) 15:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
::Yeah, sorry {{FlowMention|Matma Rex}}. I slept on it and came back to self-correct, hoping you hadn’t seen it. I had myself confused: only happens in Source mode not Visual, so Parsoid not DOM. Agree that something has to be inconsistent. If you put in extra magic for linebreaks, the result would still run counter to some group's expectations. E.g.for Reply do people expect to press enter once or twice when the leading ::: aren’t displayed? [[User:Pelagic|Pelagic]] ([[User talk:Pelagic|talk]]) 19:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
:> If I ignore the warning and leave the heading/subject blank, my new topic gets smooshed under the previous topic's heading. I think if someone does ignore the warning then we should insert some kind of default heading, even if it's "<no subject>" like you might see in some email tools.
:{{FlowMention|JKlein (WMF)}}, I think that we probably want to require a subject heading or insert a default. {{FlowMention|Pelagic}}, if "No subject" is the default, the Teahouse will end up with accessibility problems. What do you think about a default subject like "Discussion started by User:Example"? [[User:Whatamidoing (WMF)|Whatamidoing (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF)|talk]]) 19:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
| |||